We summarize: we saw how between a 2002 and 2006 real estate bubble developed in the United States containing subprimes (mortgage credits) distributed to paid poorest tolow rates to the beginning, and explosives at the end of 2 years. The system functions if interest rates are weak (bond between rate of the EDF and rate of the mortgage deeds), which is the case until 2004 and if the prices of the real estate continue to go up, allowing the refinancing by positive richness effect. The appropriations subprimes are disseminated in the credits of the economic agents most various in the whole world via in particular securitization.
This bubble falls under a continuity of bubbles (Internet…) and is explained by “an abundant money and not expensive” but more deeply by the economic, banking and financial structures founded with the beginning of the year 1980 by the ultra liberals.
I will reiterate here the essence of my chronicle n°22 of March 2009 which will allow us a setting in historical prospect.
For well to include/understand financial crisis and economic current, it is necessary us to return behind and to include/understand that nothing arrives randomly, that it is not fate, that universalization financial and economic is precisely the fruit of political decisions aiming at déconstruire what had been built, the shortly of the crisis of 1929-1930 and obviously in the name of the reform and after modernity (already and always!).
I will be voluntarily synthetic in order to have initially an overall picture and then to arrive more quickly at “than to make now? ”.
Moreover, for deepened analyses, fine, intelligent and stimulative, I return you to the writings of F. Lordon but also to the brilliant analysis of the CA Michalet universalization to detail the various mechanisms of them. It left.
A whole structure was installation in the Eighties in the world and in France in particular thanks to the banking law of 1984, the European Single act of 1986: thank you Socialists, and thank you Jacques Delors!. The principal elements of this structure are:
- the deregulation of the markets of capital (financial sector and banking) which is the freedom of the movements of capital or, differently known as, lifting of the exchange control (i.e. the possibility outward journey and return of the capital), freedom in order to escape from controls from the States, the tax and the law (bleaching…) ;
- the banking desintermediation which gives access directly and easily the markets to be financed without being obliged to borrow near the bankers (collecting saving) by thus introducing competition;
- decompartmentalization of the markets of capital inside the countries as between them (i.e. the abolition of the borders between for example stockmarket and mortage market) which “puts an end to traditional division work between the deposit banks (commercial) and the investment banks (of investment)” – principle going back in France to 1860 – and that opens the spectrum of the placements and thus loans, possibilities increased thanks to new technologies which constantly make it possible to be connected on any money market of the world by involving a very great volatility of the capital;
- the opening of the capital of the companies, i.e. the abandonment of the cross participations which protected them from the stock exchange raids and the pressure of the courses;
- financial innovations or “financial proliferations” (F. Lordon) unbounded with for example the famous securitization which is the operation indicating the transformation of granted bank credits – and right from the start they are doubtful debts – in negotiable financial titles on the markets, and that develops what the specialists call the out-assessment of the banks what means that in fact any more the banks support the risk of the credit (cf subprimes);
- various incentives so that the manager defends as well as possible the interests of the shareholders (stock-options…).
The unit is nourished with the ideology of the autolevelling market and the belief in the virtue of the men!
Thus one attends in the passing of an entrepreneurial capitalism a financial capitalism/actionnarial, which F. Lordon calls pressure “basic capitalism wage”, i.e. with the passage of the creation of richness to the famous creation of value with the 15% of return on investment ROE (Return one equity), namely profitability financial required by the shareholders, which Michalet invites “the magic rate to satisfy the new Masters”. Known as still differently, it is the mode of the domination of finance on the economic one.
A promise of paradise on ground!
Now let us evoke the principal consequences of these measurements which, taken together, make system.
A pressure develops cascades about it on the whole of the companies, even on those which are not with dimensions. Because, if the CAC 40 they are only 40 large companies, by contagion – clients in subcontracting and delocalization – the constraint of the 15% (ROE) diffuses and imposes its law mortal on all, except with the profitueurs.
Also a competition develops with the social lowest bidder (wages, social protection) and tax (to soften the taxation of the high incomes, capital incomes thus). That results by a new distribution of the richnesses and especially in the collecting of a great part, increasingly larger, richness with the detriment of the public services, poor workers, middle-class, emergent countries, the poorest countries…
This research of the profit for the profit also contaminates the brains, including without our knowledge, and is diffused in new fields like the school, health, research…, by confusing effectiveness and profitability, quantitative and qualitative.
A note:: this creation of value is only fictitious since the trees never climb to the sky. But all the actors taken with this trap made pretence believe in it, and they seemed to them well to be right to believe in it since the tree climbed, climbed and even if there were many crises, but so remote (sic): 1994 Mexico – 1997 Thailand – 1997-98 Southeast Asia – 1998 Russia – 1999 Brazil – 2001 Turkey – 2001-2002 Argentina – 2001 Bubble Internet.
But attention not to be been mistaken in target. Kerviel and consorts are rotted or covetous only you and me (good perhaps a little nevertheless!). They made their job and made a point of preserving it, taken with the trap. They were to make as well if it is better only the neighbor.
Here not of morals nor of ethics, just a play of the structures, incentives. A structure which forms system.